Wednesday, May 7, 2008

Essay: My Journey to Reason

Last year my brother asked me for my thoughts on God: given our shared, childhood Christian indoctrination, how and where did our paths diverge? I was intrigued by the project and promptly let it sit for four months. When I finally picked up my pen to attempt a reply, I drew from the many epiphanies that challenged my inherited world view.

I am apparently the black sheep of my family, who are uniformly Christian, though not monolithically so. I love my family, and my father has been devoted to Christianity since his conversion at age 18. It works for him, and I don't resent him his beliefs or lifestyle.

I have read authors like Richard Dawkins and Sam Harris who argue for the abolition of religion, however I find this too remote a possibility given man's ego. As a species we want to believe in a divine purpose for ourselves and our planet. We are seduced by this cosmic canopy above us and are loathe to acknowledge its vast vacancy.

Because of my conservative Christian upbringing, religion has always been a topic of great interest for me, so I continue to read a great deal about it. I recently happened on one blog with an essay contest for de-conversion stories, so I dusted of my letter to my brother, reworked it, and sent it in. I've posted it below and would appreciate it if you'd vote for me here once you've read it (click the stars to rate it).

I have not read all the other essays in this contest, and there may be others that are hostile toward other beliefs; naturally I can take only take responsibility for my own statements. Let me stress that I believe in tolerance for a variety of world views. Too often politics and religion are off-limits for discussion, yet these can be the most important, not to mention the most interesting, things to discuss. It's important to engage each other in the crucial issues of our time, such as the need to educate our children based on observable, testable scientific principles.

Finally, I believe it's important to speak up for a misunderstood minority in this country. Too often, atheists are dismissed as amoral or satanic, which is far from the mark. Richard Dawkins gets it right to quip that most people reject any number of gods from Zeus to Dionysus; I just take it one God further.

My Journey to Reason

The process of reconciling the world I know with the one I was taught has been painfully challenging. Like extracting an entrenched weed, several attempts passed while the root remained obstinate and unmoved. Ultimately, I have found a certainty quite unlike what I expected, yet the long journey was necessitated by the depth of indoctrination from my youth.

My father attended seminary and was a minister of music in our church. My mother divorced him before my brother and I turned five. (Apparently his proposal “I believe God would have me marry you,” was not as enduring a line as he hoped.) We stayed with our dad and attended Christian kindergarten and elementary schools, as well as weekly services Sunday mornings and evenings and Wednesday evenings. Every activity from morning to night was accompanied by prayer, whether mealtime, school time, or any other time.

The Rapture was a two-edged sword for me. I was taught to look forward to it, but I was uncertain of the protocol. I was afraid it would happen in the middle of the night while I was sleeping naked, and I would fly up to Heaven with no opportunity to throw on some PJs. Meanwhile, everyone else would be clothed and laughing and pointing at me, of course. For this reason, I was sure to always wear underwear to bed. The Rapture might be chilly, but at least it wouldn’t be naked.

God was an ever-present part of our lives, to the extent that I was convinced that I saw an angel at the foot of my bed when I was ten years old. We were simply maintaining a heightened state of openness for communications from the Almighty. I accepted what I was told, tried to be an obedient child, and I did not question the received beliefs of my father.

Two Worlds

As a child of divorced parents, I was exposed to two different ways of life. Though not hedonistic by any means, life during the summer at my mom’s was more permissive than the school year with my dad. Instead of hearing praise tapes by Sandi Patti and Steve Green, there was at least popular music from Billy Joel and Barbra Streisand. The secular world was visible in glimpses, and we were allowed to explore it.

We were set up for some fundamental confusion: Honor thy Father and Mother was inherently contradictory. We could not honor one without necessarily confounding the other. Instinctively, we followed the house rules for wherever we found ourselves and learned to get along. When I was thirteen, I elected to live with my mom, and my brother stayed with my dad. My brother still is a Christian. I have become an atheist.

There have been a number of epiphanies in my life: experiences where, then as now, I recognized I was suddenly and quite unexpectedly seeing the world with new eyes. These moments propelled me most vigorously and violently to where I now stand.

Boarding School

Time away from home is, in itself, a catalyst for growth. Through unfiltered exposure to unknown people, places, and perspectives, we take on new vocabularies that augment or replace our working set. If the new experience conforms to our present understanding, it can be easily assimilated. However, if it challenges our received wisdom, either it or our understanding must be cast aside.

I met in high school many kids who dressed, behaved, and thought differently from me. This was in greater degree than I had encountered to that point. One classmate, now a recording artist, was a gay cross-dressing singer-songwriter who performed spot-on Tori Amos songs and derivatives at monthly coffee houses. There one would also hear an Alaskan songwriter, now a successful folk-pop songstress, strumming her guitar and yodeling. These classmates and others were exceptional creatures, even then, personifying talents and lifestyles unknown to me.

I could have, certain of my Christian upbringing, with its utter exclusion of and contempt for the secular world and all its variety and color, shunned exposure to these wild elements. But I was a boy with a foot in two worlds. Divorced parents can split a child’s personality quite beyond the help of drugs or therapy. The child’s journey must ultimately determine his chosen identity, and as I made my way through high school, I remained open to situations that would provide new sensory stimuli and expand the menu from which I could select a future me.

One catalyst was my choir director, “Craig”. I had two hours of instruction a day from him and came to be included in a group of students that hung out with him, both on campus and at his nearby home.

I had the greatest respect for him in his abilities and knowledge, and his enthusiasm for music and for conducting was infectious and kindred to me. I heard one day a conversation from other students suggesting that he was gay. Gay was still, to me at that time, an abomination of a word. It suggested at once decadence, deviance, disgust, and doom. I couldn’t believe these characteristics could be applied to this man I had come to care for and admire.

“I heard something about you,” I surprised Craig one evening while alone at his house.

“What is that?”

“Something awful,” I dug deeper but was not quite ready to confront him with what I feared. Once spoken, I could not take it back. If confirmed, how would we both respond? Could our friendship continue?

He urged me on, knowing an inevitable moment had arrived, “What have you heard?”

“That … that you…,” I paused, then pushed on. “…are a homosexual.”

I felt silly almost at once. It was a word. What terrible actions was I accusing him of? There was a moment of silence in the air as my thoughts continued to race. Craig’s response was brave and wise, “Is that really so awful?”

A moment to choose: If Craig was gay, and if that was indeed awful, I could not continue to befriend him. Instead, since he was gay and since I cared about and respected him, I decided to better understand who he was, so I could fully appreciate him.

So, here I chipped away at a foundational belief, and my holy armor was thereby weakened. A tenet my father had sworn to me was no longer true from my experience. There was no great threat to me, mankind, or God Himself from my gay friend. What else would I discover was false? There were other experiences in those years: new loves, first sex, more sex, new music, new literature, new ideas, and new questions I had to answer for myself.

Germany

One of the religious questions with which I had struggled most mightily was thrown into sharp relief during my exchange year in Germany just before the end of high school. Until then, to be sure, I had encountered international students, but mostly just students from the U.S. with varying backgrounds. In Germany, and particularly in the former East Germany, I encountered people with vastly different backgrounds, experiences, and fundamental beliefs than mine.

The magnificent cathedrals of Germany are not well attended today. Western Europe has become, by many accounts, a predominantly secular region. This is true not just by comparison to its Middle Eastern neighbors, but particularly in relation to the United States. I wondered if, then, these secular Europeans were doomed to an infernal infinity by mere chance of birth. Is this the promise of a just and merciful God, that only those born to a Christian family or those fortunate enough to be visited by a missionary have an opportunity to see the light and repent? Whereas an island-born native never visited by a Western man yet living a decent, murder-, adultery-, and idolatry-free life, should be headed to hell for the mere failure to proclaim an unknown prophet as his life’s greatest treasure?

It was with this incompletely formed notion that I found myself one August night alone in the middle of a soccer field. I had been in Germany three weeks and was soon to depart for the remainder of the year with a host family. I had been enjoying a heady romance with one of our local coordinators, a twenty-one-year-old architecture student named Catrin. Aside from her help dissecting some finer points of German grammar and customs, at only seventeen, her attentions had me feeling on top of the world.

On the cusp of an unwritten foreign adventure and flush with the exoticism of the country and all of its attractions, I stood basking in the warm night air, secluded by the surrounding trees and illuminated only by the lights of the houses on the nearby hill and the starry sky. As I gazed up at the heavens, I was struck that, above these terrestrial features and geopolitical boundaries, the stars visible to me were likewise viewable to friends and family in the States and to unknown billions, of all beliefs, throughout the rest of the world.

This ecstatic feeling of oneness with the world transcended all beliefs and dogmas; I needed and wanted a god less than ever. I can’t respect a deity so vain that he will turn away good people who haven’t sung his praises. Throughout the remainder of my year in Germany, I remained impressed by a people who were so intelligent and artistic and who seemed to have little use for America’s puritanical obsessions and restrictions.

9-11

Though naturally impacted by the traumatic terrorist attacks on New York and the Pentagon, I was even more affected by the America revealed in its wake. At first, I was alarmed by the anti-Muslim fever that remains a steady undercurrent to our public discourse. I was later struck by an inconvenient truth: the terrorists didn’t hate us for our freedom, they hated us because of our beliefs—our God. And we, in kind, waged war with much the same instinct: Bush even baldly declared our anti-terror mission a “crusade.”

I began to fear the numbing, dumbing effect of religion on our country and the disastrous consequences its right-wing electorate brought to the White House and, ultimately, the Supreme Court through the 2004 elections. Where I had once considered religion a harmless, personal issue, I now saw religion as a paralyzing cancer on our democracy. We cannot make scientific strides with stem cells due to misguided puritans; we are embroiled in a losing, likely decades-long, struggle in the Middle East for no better reason than our hot prejudices compounded by a knee-jerk protectionism of Israel; we are crippling our competitive abilities by confusing our children with pabulum about Creationism and Intelligent Design; and we confuse straightforward scientific matters like global warming with misinformation borne of corporate self-interests and faith-based pseudo-scientists that peg the world as mere thousands of years old. Religion is not harmless; its existence and promulgation are direct threats to a democratic republic governed by reason and experience and educated by science.

Conclusion

I have come to realize that, in this world, what you see is what you get. As man has puzzled over the inexplicable happenings in the universe around him, he initially came up with the best explanations he could that made sense in the realm of his personal experiences. Rain falling from the sky resembles tears that fall from human eyes. Therefore, there must be some great being in the sky crying tears down on man. As more became known, some gods were replaced while others evolved. When the Pentateuch was transcribed, man had worked to make sense of a Great Flood and the destruction of great cities. What was the meaning behind this, surely it was not random?! So, the flood was sent to cleanse the earth; Sodom and Gomorrah were wicked and had to be likewise purged. These are arguably less primitive than predecessor legends but plainly this-is-why-it-is-so myths nonetheless.

It’s convenient to believe in an all-knowing, all-seeing, ever-present father figure in the sky who cares for you even if no one else does. As long as you please this imaginary figure according to a millennia-old text and your imaginary conversations with said deity, the rest of the world be damned; you’ll be all set for eternity, come what may in this life. It’s harder to accept that there is no meaning to our existence on this planet in the universe than to share with our neighbors and work together toward the betterment of our communities and our world. Hard to accept that when we die, that’s all there was to it. If you failed to make the most out of life, you get no further chances. An afterlife is much more enticing to some; but, considering its many predicted manifestations, it is also just as likely, if not more so, not to be available.

As I continue to define my philosophy, it will be based on the tenets of naturalism: science, reason, and experience. As I learn and grow, I know I will sometimes be wrong about things, but I will have a better chance of being right by being skeptical and thinking critically about the world around me, and I will keep working on my brother and hoping he will one day see the light of reason.

Monday, May 5, 2008

Nubrella

A friend pointed me at this article, which I was going to blog about anyway. I think the angle of texting while walking is kind of impractical anyway, much less while it's raining and you're under an umbrella. I was thinking that maybe the best application for the handle-less, strapped-on umbrella might be for a bicyclist in the rain.

Then, I reached the end of the article and found that one of the quoted buyers was from Youngstown:

Skye Grapentine of Youngstown, Ohio, bought the Nubrella for her birthday after stumbling across it online. She likes walking, and she likes catching up on reading the newspaper when she walks -- a pleasure that is not possible with an umbrella.

"With an umbrella, you're busy gripping it," says Grapentine. Hands-free is great because "the less you have to worry about, the more you can get done."

Monday, April 28, 2008

Defend Youngstown night with Mahoning Valley Thunder!

Very cool news: Phil Kidd and Defend Youngstown are being recognized by the Mahoning Valley Thunder arena football team in their Monday night game, May 5. Wear a Defend Youngstown T-Shirt to the game and get $5 off your ticket. Don't have a T-Shirt yet? Easy, just visit DefendYoungstown.com

Sunday, April 20, 2008

Links, Connections, and History

Palermo PiazzaI was asked to be interviewed this weekend about things that are happening in Youngstown, so I met Saturday morning with a long-time Valley resident. As a former mill worker whose father was CEO of a steel company, I fear her story was far more interesting than mine, so I spent as much time asking questions of her as she did of me. We had an enjoyable morning discussing mutual acquaintances, and I was particularly eager to get the dirt she had on so many public figures past and present.

Growing up in bland suburbia, as I did, you aren't (or at least I wasn't) aware of political gossip, so the twisted history of corruption in Youngstown is still something whose scope I don't quite fathom.

I've been doing a little more catch-up this weekend, and I ran across a great quote from a neighbor that I must share. It says quite succinctly something that I and, I think, many of my compatriots believe in fiercely but perhaps may not ever have said so articulately.

"When a town loses its past, it can believe whatever is told about it. In order for a city to prosper it must recover its identity by embracing its past and refusing to let others destroy and humiliate it." John Russo said this in 2001 in an interview with the New York Times here. As a neighbor of John's, I have the privilege of hearing him speak often, but the Palermo trip must have been quite an inspiration, because I think that's about as eloquent as I've ever heard him.

Friday, April 18, 2008

The Stage is The Rage

I attended my first full Stage at the Oakland last night, and it was amazing. I had been to part of one before but had the kids and left after hearing Chris Barzak read part of One for Sorrow. The Stage is truly the most eclectic mix of entertainment that exists in the valley, bar none. There were no bands last night, alas, but there were monologues, original readings, songs, karaoke, a hilarious sketch called "Rock 'n Roll Jesus" (my favorite of the night), and Dr. Ray's Science Sideshow (I think I've got the title close to right).

All of this was emceed by the incomparable Brooke Slanina, who would disappear during numbers, reappearing each time more and more in character as Brookeback Mountains, drag queen extraordinaire. At first, I felt like we were inconveniencing her, and I wanted to offer to read off the names for her so she could concentrate on getting dressed. But, clearly, she was as much a star of the show as anyone. And boy did she turn heads when we went out to BW3 afterwards!

Monday, April 14, 2008

Korean panel

Friday morning I participated in a panel at city hall with a group of Youngstown residents answering questions for a group of Korean journalists as a part of the East West Center's Korea-United States Journalist Exchange.

Imin International Conference CenterWe primarily discussed issues pertaining to the election and perceptions of race, gender, and class. I thought the most bizarre question was what kind of minority candidate white men in general would prefer: Hispanic, African-American, or Asian. We were perfectly stumped on how to respond to it and fell back on declaring that we were interested only in issues and integrity. But I'm still intrigued that the question was asked and I'm curious what kinds of responses were expected.

The very first question of the session was one I want to comment on primarily. A journalist asked about the Wall Street Journal article that profiled local working-class voters and their preferred candidates.

The men interviewed in the article offer frank appraisals of their view of the candidates, which clearly were making an assessment on an emotional level as to how they related to the candidates they saw on the ticket. The first two men on the panel who responded to the question basically questioned that these men really existed and that they in any case didn't represent any kind of cross section of the region's white males.

I spoke up to emphasize that these people do exist whether we like it or not, and that they're looking at the candidates in search of someone with whom they can identify. We need to find opportunities to bring people of disparate backgrounds together to move beyond prejudice. (I blatantly stole most of those thoughts from Sherry Linkon, by the way. Though, if I misquoted her, then they're my own.)

But what was being suggested, again, was that the media was manufacturing this false working-class representation of our city, when in reality YSU's Center for Working-Class Studies went to great pains to work with the Wall Street Journal to arrange the interviews.

We as a region and as a nation won't start addressing our problems until we drop our cynicism about media misrepresentations and face our weaknesses and hard truths. I'm not suggesting we believe everything we read. But let's be realistic about the challenges we have yet to overcome rather than pretending we're all innocence and roses.

Thursday, April 10, 2008

Reason: Out of Iraq

Writers are supposed to find ways to reuse their material. Since I'm not sure how many visitors to this blog are also visitors to my Vindy blog, and because this is a particularly hot topic for me from before the invasion/occupation, I'm going to take the liberty of cross-posting this in full here. Thanks for your indulgence.

I still remember calling my step-mother in February of 2003 when we were sending in more inspectors to Baghdad, and it looked like there was legitimate hope of diplomacy, and I was optimistic. I just couldn't believe we would presume to invade a sovereign nation for our own suspicions and that Bush would so bully Hussein into a corner in a way that he was really backing the U.S. into a corner.

That Bush and company still believe history will vindicate them is the only thing that inflicts me with shock and awe.
---

It's astonishing to still hear people posit that there's some victory scenario on the other side of additional time spent in Iraq. The only legacy for the American misadventures in Iraq, sadly, is a dishonestly brokered and manipulated invasion of a sovereign country. There is no victory anymore, if there ever was. Does victory include the death of tens and perhaps hundreds of thousands of Iraqis? Does victory include the complete dismantling of basic security and infrastructure elements in the country? It seems every discussion of the Iraq debacle must contain an acknowledgement that of course the world is a better place without Saddam Hussein, because this is the principle accomplishment on which the operation rests. Fine; acknowledged. But that doesn't balance the damage that has been done. Iraq is not necessarily a better place now than before the invasion, except for certain freedoms. After all, what good is freedom without the security to enjoy it?

However, it's not just the reckless Republican administration and compliant 107th Congress that deserve scorn. The Democrats who rode into the 110th Congress on a mandate to get us out of Iraq have proven ineffective at best. Matt Taibbi wrote an excellent article in February's Rolling Stone highlighting the sorry story:

Solidifying his reputation as one of the biggest pussies in U.S. political history, Reid explained his decision to refocus his party's energies on topics other than ending the war by saying he just couldn't fit Iraq into his busy schedule. "We have the presidential election," Reid said recently. "Our time is really squeezed."

There was much public shedding of tears among the Democratic leadership, as Reid, Pelosi and other congressional heavyweights expressed deep sadness that their valiant charge up the hill of change had been thwarted by circumstances beyond their control — that, as much as they would love to continue trying to end the catastrophic Iraq deal, they would now have to wait until, oh, 2009 to try again. "We'll have a new president," said Pelosi. "And I do think at that time we'll take a fresh look at it."

Part of the reason the current administration, its allies in Congress, and its military appointees are so reluctant to entertain any withdrawal scenarios is because to do so would be to admit there are things they can't control but for which they are responsible. Pandora's Box has been opened, and the monsters cannot be stuffed back inside, try though they might. They can keep kicking the can down the field, but the problem is too intractable to keep promising that six more months will bring some miracle solution. The problem is too important to the futures of Iraq and the United States to keep worrying about political reputations. So, let's get past the blame and talk about what to do now.

The most compelling plan I've seen is titled, simply, A Responsible Plan To End The War In Iraq. Endorsed by Congressional candidates and military leaders, it faces the hard problems squarely and discusses the political and diplomatic choices necessary to move forward and get out.

The United States invaded Iraq in March 2003. Since then, nearly 4,000 American troops have lost their lives and nearly thirty thousand more have suffered serious injuries, while as many as a million Iraqis may be dead. The financial costs of the war to the U.S. economy will ultimately exceed $3 trillion.

More than a year ago, the American public demanded a new direction in Iraq by electing a new Congress, and the bipartisan Iraq Study Group (the Baker-Hamilton Commission) presented a set of recommendations for just such a new direction5. President Bush rejected the majority of those recommendations and proceeded—largely unchecked by Congress—on a course explicitly contrary to them.

Since that time, the current administration and its congressional allies have continued to use shifting rationales for extending our military involvement in Iraq with no end in sight. The American public has been presented with a set of false choices: a semi-permanent military occupation of Iraq versus a precipitous and destabilizing withdrawal. There is a deepening public desire for a new path forward and a cohesive military, diplomatic, and economic strategy that will end the war in Iraq while protecting American interests.

There are two strategic questions raised by our current dilemma:

  1. How do we bring American military engagement in Iraq to a responsible end?

    There is no military solution to the problems faced in Iraq: the real progress that can be made requires diplomatic, political, and economic means. We must stop counter-productive military operations by U.S. occupation forces and end our military presence in Iraq.

  2. How do we prevent a repeat of the mistakes we’ve made?

    The breakdown of checks and balances in our government led to bad decision-making which damaged America’s national security. Ending this war and preventing future situations like it requires that we restore these Constitutional checks and balances and fix the ways in which our governmental, military, and civil institutions have failed us.

Discussions of Iraq in the media have focused almost entirely on military operations and issues, but any real solution will require us to look at a broader set of problems. Beyond redeploying our troops, we must place equal importance on applying the full arsenal of non-military tools at our disposal. The American public must also re-engage in the discussions and decision-making about how to proceed.

I urge you to review this plan, to reject submitting to name-calling by those for whom too much blood is never enough, and to consider a time to return to committing America's resources to America's needs at home. New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof wrote a compelling column two weeks ago about the costs of the war: $5,000 per second.

We’ve cut our casualty rates to the unacceptable levels that plagued us back in 2005, and we still don’t have any exit plan for years to come — all for a bill that is accumulating at the rate of almost $5,000 every second!

More important, while casualties in Baghdad are down, we’re beginning to take losses in Florida and California. The United States seems to have slipped into recession; Americans are losing their homes, jobs and health insurance; banks are struggling — and the Iraq war appears to have aggravated all these domestic woes.

A Congressional study by the Joint Economic Committee found that the sums spent on the Iraq war each day could enroll an additional 58,000 children in Head Start or give Pell Grants to 153,000 students to attend college. Or if we’re sure we want to invest in security, then a day’s Iraq spending would finance another 11,000 border patrol agents or 9,000 police officers.

Imagine the possibilities. We could hire more police and border patrol agents, expand Head Start and rehabilitate America’s image in the world by underwriting a global drive to slash maternal mortality, eradicate malaria and deworm every child in Africa.

All that would consume less than one month’s spending on the Iraq war.

Moreover, the Bush administration has financed this war in a way that undermines our national security — by borrowing. Forty percent of the increased debt will be held by China and other foreign countries.

Kristof ends his column, "I don't feel that I'm getting my money's worth." Do you?